Bandwidth glutton - CNode vs PERF

Author	Message
Aurum Send message Joined: 10 Feb 21 Posts: 7 Credit: 188,170 RAC: 0	Message 1055 - Posted: 11 Feb 2021, 14:51:19 UTC Which WU consumes your bandwidth more??? ID: 1055 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Fardringle Send message Joined: 12 Nov 19 Posts: 34 Credit: 111,498,836 RAC: 18,988	Message 1075 - Posted: 10 Mar 2021, 19:13:35 UTC - in response to Message 1055. I haven't done a scientific study to get exact numbers, but I can say that running multiple Linux/CNODE tasks puts a lot more stress on my router than 8-10 times as many Windows/PERF tasks does. ID: 1075 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Aurum Send message Joined: 10 Feb 21 Posts: 7 Credit: 188,170 RAC: 0	Message 1100 - Posted: 22 Mar 2021, 15:17:15 UTC I was watching with Glasswire and couldn't tell for sure. I think Cnode can run continuously, submit and get a new WU right away. Perf has a blast of activity, finishes quickly and the server at least 5 minutes before sending the next WU. ID: 1100 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

JohnMD Send message Joined: 22 May 20 Posts: 11 Credit: 1,662,860 RAC: 190	Message 1102 - Posted: 22 Mar 2021, 20:35:04 UTC - in response to Message 1100. I was watching with Glasswire and couldn't tell for sure. I think Cnode can run continuously, submit and get a new WU right away. Perf has a blast of activity, finishes quickly and the server at least 5 minutes before sending the next WU. If you examine the log you will see that Perf implements a 303 second wait when it starts. ID: 1102 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote